Below is an
example of using cooperative learning to teach a math lesson based on the three
major components of cooperative learning: "lesson preparation,"
"lesson instruction," and "lesson evaluation." In this
example, five students with LD attend a third grade general education classroom
for most of the school day and receive special education resource remedial
assistance for mathematics skills. The cooperative learning activity in this
example is taking place in the general education setting where the general and
special education teachers plan and teach cooperative learning math activities
collaboratively twice a week.
Lesson preparation
During "preparation" the cooperative learning math
activity is designed; a description of "preparation" activities
follows.
Establish objectives. In this example, the instructional
objective for mathematics is: "Students will solve two-step story problems
containing extraneous information with 90% accuracy." The collaborative
objective is: "Students will encourage and support teammates and share
materials when requested." The objectives are based on (a) school district
special education curriculum guides, (b) students' Individualized Education
Program goals for mathematics and social skills, (c) curriculum-based
assessment of whole number computation, and (d) observations of group behaviors
and interactions.
Structure the activity. In whole group instruction, the
instructional objective will be addressed by reviewing with all students the
steps of a story problem-solving strategy that was learned the previous week.
Students will recite the strategy's steps using cue cards. Using the strategy,
two story problems will be solved by the teachers who will recite the steps and
verbalize their thinking processes as they work through the problems. Then,
students will solve two story problems with the teachers. Next, students will
review cooperative learning role responsibilities and explain ways to encourage
and support each other. Rules about sharing also will be reviewed.
In the cooperative learning group, "numbered
heads" will be used as the activity structure. Students will use their
strategy cue cards to solve four story problems. Teachers will facilitate group
work and interactions. Time will be allowed for group processing and students
(when called on by group and number) will explain how their group solved a
particular story problem.
Promote the elements of cooperative learning. Student roles
will be assigned and bonus points will be distributed intermittently based on
each group's demonstration of encouraging and supportive behavior. One strategy
cue card will be distributed to each group, thus necessitating sharing of the
card. A posttest will be individually administered containing four story
problems to determine if students can solve the story problems independently
using their cue cards. The reading level of the story problems will be
controlled for different ability levels in the classroom.
Identify
the roles and groups. Each group will include a timekeeper to monitor the time
and keep the group on task, a materials person to manage the cue card, a writer
to record the group's problem-solving responses and answers, and a spokesperson
to lead the group during group processing time and to share the group's results
with the teacher. The groups will consist of four students; only one student
with LD will be a member of each group.
Table 2. Questions for Evaluating
Mathematical Abilities in Cooperative Learning Groups
|
1. Language/Vocabulary
- Are
students using new vocabulary words properly?
- Do
students possess prerequisite vocabulary?
- Can
students provide explanations in their own words for cooperative learning
math activities, such as solving word problems and algorithms?
|
2. Rules
- Can
Students explain to each other the rules that were taught during direct
instruction, which must be applied in the cooperative learning activity?
- Can
students apply the rules to the cooperative learning math activity or do they
require teacher assistance?
- Can
students use manipulatives to demonstrate rules?
|
3. Strategies
and Algorithms
- Have students learned the strategies and
algorithms?
- Can
students explain the strategies and algorithms to each other?
- Do
students require visual cures for remembering the strategies an algorithms?
- Can
students apply strategies and algorithms to a variety of problems?
- Do
students require teacher prompting and questions to help remember the
strategies and algorithms?
|
4. Connections
- Can
students explain how the new information relates to previously mastered math
skills and concepts?
- How
do students explain the relevance of learning new math skills and concepts to
everyday life?
- How
do students apply the new knowledge to activities that involve other
disciplines (e.g., science, social studies)?
- Can
students depict math information using visuals, graphics, manipulatives, and
abstract symbols?
- Can
students make connections between concrete-semi-concrete-abstract
representations?
|
Lesson instruction
Implementation of the math lesson, in this example, requires
direct instruction followed by the cooperative learning activity. The instructional
steps are described below.
Provide an advance organizer. Explain the purpose of the
lesson and the instructional and collaborative objectives. Describe the
lesson's activities and the teachers' roles in the lesson. Remind students that
they worked on a story problem-solving strategy last week and ask for a
definition of a strategy.
Present the lesson. Have students refer to their strategy
cue cards and repeat the strategy steps. Ask individual students to recite the
steps, then ask students to repeat the steps without referring to the cue card,
if possible. Next, model solving a story problem using the strategy cue card
and verbalizing the steps. Have students imitate this process solving another
problem at their desks. Ask for answers and explanations of how the problem was
solved.
Explain the cooperative learning activity, using the
"numbered heads" structure. Remind students that they can use a cue
card to solve their four story problems. Review students' roles and
responsibilities and ask for explanations of how students encourage and support
one another. Provide directions for transitioning into cooperative learning
groups, set a time, distribute materials, and review the task. Once students
are in groups, serve as a facilitator by guiding students with questions (e.g.,
"What are the steps in the strategy?" "What do you do
first?" "How do you determine extraneous information?") or
providing further instruction if necessary. Reinforce groups for demonstrating
appropriate collaborative behaviors. Provide time for group processing, and
call on students by number and group to provide answers to the story problems.
Lesson evaluation
Evaluating the students' mastery of the instructional and
collaborative objectives is critical. As mentioned earlier in this article,
there are three types of evaluation. In this example, the first evaluation can
be done during the cooperative learning activity: note evaluative comments that
may assist in planning additional lessons or document individual student difficulty.
For instance, evaluation questions like those in Table 1 can be used to
determine mastery or potential trouble spots solving story problems. The second
evaluation is individual and can be done following the group activity by
administering a posttest. This can help teachers determine students' ability to
solve story problems on their own and to apply the strategy. Finally, have
students evaluate themselves during group processing to determine their
abilities with the designated collaborative skills. This evaluation should be
shared with the teacher to be sure that teacher and student perceptions of
abilities match.
References:
http://www.ldonline.org/article/5932/




No comments:
Post a Comment
Give Your Comment Please!