The concept of number
is the most basic and fundamental in the world of science and mathematics. Yet
a satisfactory answer to what a number is was attained only in 1884 A.D. by Gottlob Fregé [1], the founder of modern mathematical logic. His answer
remained unknown to the world until Bertrand Russell, the English mathematician
and logician, in his attempt to base all of mathematics in terms of the concept
of sets, rediscovered the concept of number.
The concept of number
is associated with the concept of a "set." As of 2005 A.D., mankind
possessed two ways of explaining the concept of number. One was the Von Neuman
method and the other the Fregé concept.
A "set" is a
term like the term "point" is in Geometry where it is not defined but
taken as a "primitive" whose meaning is brought out by the axioms.
Similarly, a set is described by the axioms of set theory. Informally, set
means a collection of definite and separate objects of any kind for which we
can decide whether or not a given object belongs. So to exhibit a set, you show
all the objects - popularly called elements - in the collection by either
exhibiting each individual element in the collection or precisely describing
which elements belong. An instance of the former is the set comprised of, say,
three names, Bob, Mary, and Marg; the set is exhibited by providing a list of
its elements inside two curly brackets thus: {Bob,Mary,Marg}. The order in
which the elements are listed inside the brackets is not relevant. When a set
contains a very large number of elements, it is inconvenient or impractical to
position each element inside the curly brackets and so the second method is
used. That is, we describe precisely those elements that belong to the set. We
can use ordinary language when that will do - for example, the set of all
people on earth. Or, we can also use curly brackets thus: {x | x is a person of
the Earth}; where the vertical line means "satisfying the condition
that," or simply "such that."
Von Neumann [1923]
proposed that all numbers could be bootstrapped out of the empty set by the operations
of the mind as follows.
0 = {} (empty set)
1 = {0} = { {} }
2 = {0,1} = { {}, { {} } }
3 = {0,1,2} = {{}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }}
4 = {0,1,2,3} = { {}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }, {{}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }} } ....
1 = {0} = { {} }
2 = {0,1} = { {}, { {} } }
3 = {0,1,2} = {{}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }}
4 = {0,1,2,3} = { {}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }, {{}, { {} }, { {}, { {} } }} } ....
This construction is
wonderful and simple and shows why, for instance, 1 is less than 2, or in
general why given any two distinct numbers a and b, either a < b or a >
b. There are many other properties of this scheme. However, the one shortcoming
of the scheme is that it is an artifice of construction and does not tell us
what a number is except in terms of the construction. For instance, 0 is the
empty set, 1 the set consisting of the empty set, 2 is the set whose elements
are the empty set and the set consisting of the empty set, and so on.
To understand this
scheme, we would have to go to the concept enshrined in it, namely the Theory
of Concepts advanced by Fregé. And it would explain why von Neumann chose the
empty set to represent zero.
Numeral
Numeral is the symbol for the idea called number. Put another way, the number is the idea we think of when we see the numeral or when we see or hear the word for a numeral.
Numeral is the symbol for the idea called number. Put another way, the number is the idea we think of when we see the numeral or when we see or hear the word for a numeral.
Suppose there is a
person named Jim. This person has the name Jim because he was named so. It is
very convenient! A numeral is like the name Jim.
Now, if someone says
number 3, we know what really is meant. 3 is the numeral for the number the
person wishes to communicate to us. Since this is to be always understood, we
just say "number 3."
An alien coming to
earth might be amused to note that we have given this number the name 3. A
computer on earth would have to be told that this number is 11, because 11 is 3
in binary notation. 11 in binary and 3 in decimal notation are called
"numerals." As you know, III is the Roman numeral for 3.
On the web page Numeration Systems, we discuss the various systems like the binary, decimal
and others for writing numerals.
[1] Gottlob Fregé, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik (1884)




No comments:
Post a Comment
Give Your Comment Please!